Thursday, May 12, 2016

Learning from a Project "Post-mortem"


      By no means am I professional in this field, however, when presented with any opportunity to enhance and gain experience in the instructional design field, I eagerly participate. About two years ago I worked for a small business that managed HVAC systems across the country, and the need was realized for the creation of an inter-departmental training manual to act as a cross training employee resource during the off-peak seasons. Not only did I have to create step-by-step processes for my department, but I also had to compile the processes from all other departments and format it into one complete document. The primary objective of this project was to make a reference manual that employees can consult in the event a key player or manager of another was indisposed during weekend work hours.

     Prior to the manual being created, once a new hire was assigned to a specific department, they were trained in that area only without knowing the jobs and responsibilities of any other department; despite this company being classified as a small business. The major issue this posed was if an individual was scheduled to work on either the weekend or after normal business hours (typically after 5 p.m.), if a maintenance emergency occurred; such as an indisposed contractor in a sparsely populated area, the individual on duty did not know how to search computer systems for alternatives or the procedures for hiring and approving rates for a temporary contractor.

      Because the owners of the company recognized a need for cross-training, especially during off-peak seasons, the initial project would entail the creation of a manual by the Vendor Management Department, followed by mini training sessions over a period of six months.  Being one of the main contract writers in the Vendor Management Department, myself along with five other employees were tasked with gathering information from the various departments, consulting with department leads on the accuracy of content gathered, and ensuring that all information was up-to-date and relevant with any system updates. While this was a very informal project that did not follow any standard processes, I believe I was chosen for this task because of my experience with creating and editing contracts that the company currently uses.

Successes
Establishment of a time line
      From the onset, all stakeholders involved agreed that the manual had to be completed within a certain time frame and the approval and upload of the manual into the company’s server has to launch after three weeks of starting the project. The established time line helped everyone stay on task and complete individual portions according to schedule. Each person was held accountable for their portion of the project and the component they had to complete. Because the time line was adhered to, it prompted the company’s owners to approve the final draft of the manual and make plans for the establishment of an instructor led cross-training course.

Failures
Lack of Team Formation and Role Assignments
      One of the major components that lacked in this project was the formation of a team and a creation of a task list. My mission was solely to compile a document within a time frame, in addition to performing my daily tasks associated with my position. Even though I had a supervisor assigned to complete the manual with me, we always butt heads because superficial design struggles rather than focusing on the content. The lack of a team also fueled individual competition which only added to the constant butting of heads that occurred frequently. Another component that contributed to the partial failure of this project was the lack of assigned roles. With no definitive roles for the project, the term “too many chiefs” applied throughout the project. With no specified leader, everyone saw themselves as the boss, and ultimately wanted their way to be the final say. The lack of role assignments often caused overlapping roles and often times double work being done.

      Portny et. al (2008), outlined five life cycle phases of a project: conceive, define, start, perform, and close of planning a project and to be honest only two of those phases were completed. Given the knowledge I know now, I believe if I had access to these resources, the project would have been more organized and completed without minor issues. The only thing that contributed to this project’s success was a collective determination to complete the document by the given deadline. If I could do it over again, each cycle of planning a project would be followed thoroughly employing all of the strategies suggested.

Reference:
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S, J., Meredith, J, R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., and Kramer, B. E. (2008). Planning projects: Preparing, executing, and completing successful projects. In Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects (pp. 76). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

2 comments:

  1. Natoya,

    If I were to hazard an educated guess based on your story, I would say you were handed a project that your superiors did not seem to have a full grasp of the complexities. With no team formation or role assignments, it seems you and your supervisor were left to figure things out pretty much on your own. While the need for the project is quite clear and necessary, the project seemed to go off the rails right after that. Cross-training is a business catch word because it does make operating any business easier, but it can be quite an elusive goal to attain. It seems like your WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) was a simple list of here is the project, now go get it done (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, & Kramer, 2008, pg. 86). No teams, not hierarchy, no organization, and no WBS. I can’t imagine why you had difficulties. It sounds like the Keystone Cops version of planning. Just imagining myself in your position cause me stress.

    Thanks for sharing your experience!
    Michael

    References
    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E.
    (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken,
    NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello,
    Although you were faced with difficulties as we sometimes are you still seemed to pull it off. I am not a trained in the field of Instructional design. Many of the things I learned have been through these courses as well as my course mates. I am learning so much through everyone's experiences along with the course materials. Because you are good at your job,it seems like your company gave you this task. The task in my opinion was with out a plan. The organization knew the results they wanted but did not provide a SOW (statement of work) to help with the initial process. According to Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer,& Sutton both the people who requested the project and the project team, through the process of negotiation and discussion, should agree to all terms in the Statement of Work before actual project work is started. Some form of it was given but not enough structure for everyone to adhere to there particular part of the project and stay in their own lane. Without the deadline, I think the project would have gone tremendously over schedule. The timeline was the glue that held this project together. I commend you and keeping your composure throughout this project.

    Audrey

    References
    Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    ReplyDelete